Skip to main content

Final Fight: 30th anniversary


Thirty years ago Final Fight came out on the Super Nintendo. The game itself is older, being a port of a 1989 arcade hit. Although originally developed by Capcom as a sequel to Street Fighter, the name was changed since it's a "beat-'em-up," whereas Street Fighter was a fighting game (player v. player).

I've never played the arcade version, but I played one of the sequels on the SNES. It couldn't have been the original, which is one-player only. This is by far the game's biggest flaw. Beat-'em-ups aren't very fun by yourself; the whole point is to team up with a friend to take down all the enemies or die trying. Lack of a two-player option on console games was a common problem back then: Double Dragon was also one-player on NES.

Final Fight's biggest draw, I suppose, is you can choose from two characters, a huge lumberjack-type named Haggar, or a slimmer guy named Cody. Each has a slightly different move set. The arcade game had a third character, a ninja named Guy. He was so sorely missed that Capcom later released a second version of the game (rare in the U.S.) called Final Fight Guy that replaced Cody with Guy. Too little, too late.

I played Final Fight for about an hour and didn't enjoy it much. It's basically button-mashing. You walk up to an enemy and choose one of a small selection of possible attacks. Pressing Y throws a punch, or you jump first with B, then hit Y to do a jump kick. Alternately you can walk into the enemy to grab him, then press Y to attack. Haggar head-butts the enemy, whereas Cody knees them in the stomach. If you hold a direction while doing this, your character throws the enemy instead (in the case of Haggar, via a back drop). You can also press Y and B at the same time to do a special attack that costs a little of your own health. Each player has a couple other moves as well, such as Haggar's pile driver, but regardless which attack you choose, it's all pretty much the same.

Sometimes you find a weapon (like in Double Dragon), most commonly a knife, which mixes things up a bit. Haggar always throws the knife, but Cody can stab with it if an enemy is in range. Occasionally you encounter things like containers and stacks of tires that hide bits of food that restore health or bonus items like hats, which give you points. Given that the game has a final boss and definitive end, points mean nothing. Old habits die hard, though, and points lingered in video games well into the 90's. 

Each stage is made up of sub-areas in which you beat up various thugs. Each stage ends with a boss. The first one, Damnd, whose name was changed to Thrasher for the SNES, is easy. He looks like Dog the Bounty Hunter. Dog—I mean Damnd—I mean Thrasher summons a few underlings to help him. The second one, Sodom is far harder, as he has two katanas and also charges at you. You won't be surprised to hear that for the SNES his name was changed to Katana! You can use his katana against him, and it's even called Masamune (like in Final Fantasy)! Apparently Guy, being a ninja, hits harder and faster with it, but as I mentioned he's sadly absent in this version.

I haven't yet made it to the third boss because, unfortunately, on the SNES you get only three continues! If you want to try again after that, you have to replay the whole game from the beginning. I played three or four times, and that was enough for me. I'd play it again only with someone else.

Another shortcoming of the SNES port is that it removed the fourth stage, reducing the total number to just five. Graphically and aurally, the game is fine. Compared to NES games, the huge sprites are very cool. This looks way better than, for example, the Double Dragon games. But for the most part I found the backgrounds and enemies forgettable. They aren't bad, but they aren't that great, either. The most interesting character both visually and to play is Haggar, who also happens to be the main character since it's his daughter who has been kidnapped by the gang. Yes, it's another old video game where men rescue a woman.
Final Fight is a two-button arcade game (X, A, R, and L are unused on the SNES) that could have been an NES game, except it couldn't handle it graphically. In fact, Final Fight did become an NES game: Mighty Final Fight was released on the NES a couple years later. It was a humorous chibi-style game that added experience points, and it included Guy! I look forward to playing it eventually, as it's by all accounts a good game.

This game was not made for me, but it's by no means bad. However, it really should have been two-player. The lack of that, of one of the three characters, and of one of the six stages all come together to make Final Fight for the SNES a disappointing port. Grade: B-
Linked Reviews
"A game that's fun to play and worth a look, but disappointing in comparison to the iconic arcade unit. With no multiplayer and a limited roster, Final Fight lacks replay value to back up the initial enjoyment."
— Steve Bowling, NintendoLife, 7/10

"The shock of seeing such massive, arcade perfect sprites beat the seven shades of snot out of each other was dampened slightly by the disappointment of the missing two player option. The fact that the game was also lacking Guy and the factory level didn't help."
— Damien McFerran, VC Reviews, 7/10

"Having loved the arcade version, the stripped-down SNES port was a disappointment to me, especially with its missing two-player mode and not having my favorite character, Guy, as a selectable fighter."
— Pat Contri, Ultimate Nintendo: Guide to the SNES Library, 3.5/5

"It was an evolutionary brawler in its original coin-op form, taking the beat-'em-up structure of earlier titles like Double Dragon to the next level."
IGN, #100 of Top 100

"Final Fight looked great from a distance, but it wasn't an all-day arcade-perfect experience eager fans had been promised. Without its two-player mode, Final Fight doesn't have much going for it beyond the initial impression it gives."
— Jeremy Parish, Super NES Works

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mysterious Murasame Castle: Non-stop ninja frenzy!

The Mysterious Murasame Castle is a bit of a lost treasure. It's a frenetic samurai-and-ninja game set in feudal Japan. The real mystery is why Nintendo didn't bring it to the West (until 2014), where I'm confident it would have been a hit remembered alongside Ninja Gaiden . Look familiar? This game is a sort of fraternal twin to The Legend of Zelda . Both were made from the same game engine, and it really shows. They both launched on the Famicom Disk System in early 1986, taking advantage of its save feature. However, whereas Zelda is an open-world game with nine dungeons, The Mysterious Murasame Castle is stage-based. You control Takamura through four pairs of two levels each: an above-ground section followed by a castle. The ninth and final stage is the titular Murasame Castle. Although there are branching pathways, stages are mostly linear, like the dungeons in The Legend of Zelda. The Mysterious Murasame Castle Famicom disk The main gimmick of the game is that, wheneve

Super Ghouls 'n Ghosts: 30th anniversary

Super Ghouls 'n Ghosts is an SNES-exclusive sequel to Ghouls 'n Ghosts, itself a sequel to Ghosts 'n Goblins . Like its predecessors, its claim to fame (or infamy) is being ridiculously hard. Super Ghouls 'n Ghosts follows the formula of Ghosts 'n Goblins to a tee. You control a knight named Arthur who must rescue Princess Guinevere by battling endless hordes of monsters and demons: Zombies, Ghosts, Weredogs, Bats, Red Arremers, and even Mimics (the D&D monster that disguises itself as a treasure chest). He picks up various weapons along the way but can only hold one at a time. Some of them (especially the torch) are worse than the throwing spears he begins with. Three new weapons are the crossbow, scythe, and tri-blade. The crossbow is good because it shoots two arrows at once, at about 45 and 30 degree angles upward. I avoid the scythe because Arthur can throw only one at a time and the ability to arc it downward by holding ↓ does not compensate for this. The

Super Mario Bros.: The Lost Levels: Mario misstep

Given the enormous success of  Super Mario Bros. , Nintendo naturally wanted a sequel. It seems they wanted it so bad that, to quote Dr. Ian Malcom, they "were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should." Super Mario Bros. 2 landed on the Famicom Disk System in June of 1986, a mere nine months after the original. In English it was later given the name The Lost Levels since it was never released on the NES. The prematurity of the sequel shows as soon as you boot the game. It looks almost exactly like the original, down to the same title screen (with a 2), same sprites, and same backgrounds. There are a few visual tweaks, such as new ground tiles and faces on the clouds, trees, mushrooms, and moving platforms. The game has no new power-ups or enemies (except more aggressive red Piranha Plants). There are a few new elements, but they aren't very good. The Poison Mushroom hurts Mario (or Luigi); Super Springs propel him far ab