Skip to main content

Wrecking Crew: The forgotten Mario game

As a child I was ignorant of nearly all NES games beyond what I and my friends owned, but I remember seeing pictures of Wrecking Crew (perhaps in Nintendo Power). It was hard to believe there was this janky-looking Mario game no one I knew had ever played! Now that I've played it, it's still kind of hard to believe.

Wrecking Crew reminds me of Clu-Clu Land. It's kind of irritating but can suck you in, if you play it long enough. It's addictive, not because it's especially fun, but because you always want to solve the next stage. You want to prove that you can master this old game's weirdness! (Or I did, anyway.)

The game it most reminds me of is The Adventures of Lolo, except that game is cute and this thing is ugly af. Visually, I hate it. Mario looks terrible. And why are some of the enemies eggplants!? (What is up with Nintendo and eggplants?)
Not the most beautiful game ever created
The goal of each stage is to smash all the breakable walls. They are in the background, so breaking them doesn't open any paths, but sometimes you have to destroy ladders, too. This is where some of the puzzle element starts to come in, because you may need some of those ladders! Levels generally have to be solved from top to bottom due to the one-way ladder called gravity.

In addition to breaking walls, some stages have bombs, which, when hit, can cause a chain reaction of destruction. They can also destroy certain platforms holding empty drums. With careful timing, you can trap an enemy inside a falling drum. Exploding these platforms can also open up new pathways, or even block your path, forcing a restart (by pushing SELECT).

After the ugly gray-brown visuals, my second least favorite part of Wrecking Crew is the enemies (especially Eggplant Man). They zip around following a homing pattern, and you have to constantly avoid them. As the levels get harder, figuring out patterns for avoiding the enemies becomes increasingly important and difficult. It doesn't help that you're constantly avoiding fireballs as well a la Mario Bros., but unlike in that game you can't jump, so if there's an enemy behind you, you're doomed.
Who at Nintendo was traumatized by eggplants?
After a few hours, I was able to complete the first 25 levels. It has an impressive 100, and you can choose any level you like, no password necessary. They do get a little repetitive, but their puzzly nature distinguishes one from another (unlike, say, Ice Climber). Each stage feels like a fresh challenge. As a result, Wrecking Crew can become addictive.

Different people enjoy different games. While I found this game somewhat tedious and frustrating, I can easily imagine other people loving it, especially with 100 unique levels on offer. Not only that, but you can design your own! The level-editor is intuitive and gives you total freedom. Too bad you can't save them (except through save states in emulation)! I've learned from Jeremy Parish's NES Works that in Japan you could save your levels in both this and Excitebike by purchasing a tape recorder peripheral. Although the NES has an expansion port on the bottom, nothing was ever released for it!
I made this level and named it R-♥.
It's not my cup of tea, but Wrecking Crew isn't bad. With 100 levels, a robust level editor, and plenty of challenge for action-puzzle lovers, it's a solid launch title.

Grade: C

Gameplay: Sporadically fun or niche (12/20)
Theme: Interesting concept and characters, if a bit generic (16/20)
Controls: Controls are smooth and let you do what you want (15/15)
Difficulty: Goldilocks: Not too hard, not too easy (15/15)
Graphics: Doesn't look great (9/15)
Sound: Music and sounds are repetitive (9/15)
This wraps up my series on launch titles. I have never even seen a real R.O.B. (needed to play Gyromite and Stack-Up), and 10-Yard Fight and Kung Fu have not been re-released. There's a reason for that: they are the only two launch titles made by third parties. It wouldn't surprise me if Nintendo eventually strikes up a licensing deal to put either or both of these on Nintendo Switch Online, and in that event I will play them.

My next series will be some early Famicom games that never made it to the NES. Stay tuned!

Linked Reviews
"Wrecking Crew is an ambitious game, and even in the face of the occasional exhausting aggravation, this puzzle-platformer has a lot to offer."
— Stephen Kelly, Nintendo Life, 6/10

"A simple game, this title has enough unique puzzle action to keep things interesting, at least for a short while."
— Pat Contri, Ultimate Nintendo, 3/5

"Wrecking Crew remains addictive and enjoyable to this day. For my money, it’s one of the quintessential puzzle titles for the system alongside the Lolo series."
— Dylan Cornelius, Questicle, A-

"Wrecking Crew feels like a bit of an orphan in Nintendo’s history, the final experimental Mario game before the character’s true canon was established once and for all, destroying his freedom to undertake such oddball efforts."
— Jeremy Parish, NES Works


Popular posts from this blog

Mysterious Murasame Castle: Non-stop ninja frenzy!

The Mysterious Murasame Castle is a bit of a lost treasure. It's a frenetic samurai-and-ninja game set in feudal Japan. The real mystery is why Nintendo didn't bring it to the West (until 2014), where I'm confident it would have been a hit remembered alongside Ninja Gaiden . Look familiar? This game is a sort of fraternal twin to The Legend of Zelda . Both were made from the same game engine, and it really shows. They both launched on the Famicom Disk System in early 1986, taking advantage of its save feature. However, whereas Zelda is an open-world game with nine dungeons, The Mysterious Murasame Castle is stage-based. You control Takamura through four pairs of two levels each: an above-ground section followed by a castle. The ninth and final stage is the titular Murasame Castle. Although there are branching pathways, stages are mostly linear, like the dungeons in The Legend of Zelda. The Mysterious Murasame Castle Famicom disk The main gimmick of the game is that, wheneve

Super Ghouls 'n Ghosts: 30th anniversary

Super Ghouls 'n Ghosts is an SNES-exclusive sequel to Ghouls 'n Ghosts, itself a sequel to Ghosts 'n Goblins . Like its predecessors, its claim to fame (or infamy) is being ridiculously hard. Super Ghouls 'n Ghosts follows the formula of Ghosts 'n Goblins to a tee. You control a knight named Arthur who must rescue Princess Guinevere by battling endless hordes of monsters and demons: Zombies, Ghosts, Weredogs, Bats, Red Arremers, and even Mimics (the D&D monster that disguises itself as a treasure chest). He picks up various weapons along the way but can only hold one at a time. Some of them (especially the torch) are worse than the throwing spears he begins with. Three new weapons are the crossbow, scythe, and tri-blade. The crossbow is good because it shoots two arrows at once, at about 45 and 30 degree angles upward. I avoid the scythe because Arthur can throw only one at a time and the ability to arc it downward by holding ↓ does not compensate for this. The

Super Mario Bros.: The Lost Levels: Mario misstep

Given the enormous success of  Super Mario Bros. , Nintendo naturally wanted a sequel. It seems they wanted it so bad that, to quote Dr. Ian Malcom, they "were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should." Super Mario Bros. 2 landed on the Famicom Disk System in June of 1986, a mere nine months after the original. In English it was later given the name The Lost Levels since it was never released on the NES. The prematurity of the sequel shows as soon as you boot the game. It looks almost exactly like the original, down to the same title screen (with a 2), same sprites, and same backgrounds. There are a few visual tweaks, such as new ground tiles and faces on the clouds, trees, mushrooms, and moving platforms. The game has no new power-ups or enemies (except more aggressive red Piranha Plants). There are a few new elements, but they aren't very good. The Poison Mushroom hurts Mario (or Luigi); Super Springs propel him far ab